Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hole-induced bulk and interface defect generation and breakdown in ultrathin silicon dioxide (2.0 and 3.0 nm) are studied using substrate hot-hole injection. The results show that although these substrate hot holes are effective in creating electrically active damage in the dielectrics, these defects are very ineffective in causing breakdown as compared to those defects created by constant voltage tunneling stress. Identical to hole trapping in thicker oxides, substrate hot-hole defect generation was independent of electric field, decreased with decreasing thickness, and increased with decreasing temperature. The defect generation and breakdown of ultrathin oxides by substrate hot-hole stress is significantly different from that observed for constant voltage tunneling stress. The results suggest that the degradation and breakdown of ultrathin silicon dioxide cannot be explained by the trapping of hot holes alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogel et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: