Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New amidine and benzene sulfonamide derivatives were developed and structures of the new products were confirmed by elemental and spectral analysis (FT‐IR, ESI‐MS, 1 HNMR, and 13 CNMR). In vitro, developed compounds were screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activities against medically important bacterial strains, namely, S. aureus, B. subtilis , and E. coli , and fungi, namely, A. flavus, A. parasiticus , and A. sp. The antibacterial and antifungal activities have been determined by measuring MIC values ( μ g/mL) and zone of inhibitions (mm). Among the tested compounds, it was found that compounds 3b , 9a , and 9b have most potent activity against S. aureus, A. flavus, and A. parasiticus , respectively, and were found to be more active than sulfamethoxazole and itraconazole with MIC values 40 μ g/mL. In contrast, all the compounds were totally inactive against the A. sp. except 10b and 15b to show activity to some extent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qadir et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: