Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Female white rats were exposed in a «nose only» inhalation device to an aerosol containing predominantly submicron (nanoscale included) particles of amorphous silica in a total concentration of 2.6±0.6 or 10.6±2.1 mg/m3, 4 h/day, 5 times a week, during up to 6 months. In an auxiliary experiment with a single-shot intratracheal instillation of these particles, it was shown that they induced a pulmonary cell response comparable with that when administrated a highly cytotoxic and fibrogenic standard quartz dust DQ12. However in a long-term inhalation test, the aerosol investigated proved to be of a very low systemic toxicity and fibrogenicity. This paradox may be explained by a low retention of SiO2 in lungs and other organs due to a relatively high in vivo solubility of those nanoparticles. Nevertheless their genotoxic action and transnasal penetration into the brain urge caution when assessing occupational or environmental hazard of that aerosol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sutunkova et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: