Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Power law relationships of the form R=aA/sup b/ are derived, where R is the rainfall rate, and A is the 35-GHz specific attenuation A/sub h/ or specific differential attenuation /spl Delta/A=A/sub h/-A/sub v/, where the subscripts h and v indicate horizontal and vertical polarizations. The effects of raindrop size distribution, canting, and oscillation on these relationships are evaluated quantitatively. The drop size distributions (DSDs) are obtained from ground-based disdrometer measurements from three different geographical locations around the world. The R-A/sub h/ relationship is negligibly affected by raindrop canting and oscillation. It is affected to some extent by DSD variations, with less than 15% fractional standard error (FSE) in the estimated rainfall rate R/sub Ah/. On the other hand, the R-/spl Delta/A relationship is most sensitive to raindrop oscillation, up to about 35% difference in R/sub /spl Delta/A/ compared to the no-oscillation case, and the effect of canting is about 9% for a standard deviation of 10/spl deg/ of the polar canting angle compared with no canting. The FSE due to variations in the DSD for R20 mm h/sup -1/, the FSE in R/sub /spl Delta/A/ is comparable (and even lower for R>30 mm h/sup -1/) to that of R/sub Ah/. The exceptions to this are rainfall rates with DSDs dominated by smaller raindrops (diameters less than 2.4 mm). It is also emphasized that because oscillation and canting affect /spl Delta/A but not A/sub h/, they could be used in combination for determining the presence of drop oscillation and canting and for estimating an effective raindrop shape model (axial ratio versus size).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aydin et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: