Key result
Patients with pseudoexfoliative syndrome exhibited significantly higher peak exercise corrected QT dispersion (65.19 ms vs 38.31 ms) and delayed recovery compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
Extraocular accumulation in pseudoexfoliative syndrome is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but the effect of exercise testing on corrected QT dispersion and its recovery remained to be investigated.
Does pseudoexfoliative syndrome increase corrected QT dispersion at rest and during exercise compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=75)
No
Does pseudoexfoliative syndrome increase corrected QT dispersion at rest and during exercise compared to controls?
Patients with pseudoexfoliative syndrome exhibit prolonged corrected QT dispersion at rest and during exercise, suggesting a potentially higher risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
Increased QTcd and delayed recovery with exercise in PEX may indicate arrhythmia risk; leaves open clinical relevance pending validation.
Background: In pseudoexfoliative syndrome (PEX), extraocular accumulation is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of exercise test on corrected QT dispersion (QTcd) and QTcd recovery in PEX. Patients and Methods: A total of 37 patients diagnosed as PEX were included in the study. The control group consisted of 38 patients. The Electrocardiographies (ECG) were taken. The patients were subjected to an exercise test. Results: In the study group, baseline, peak and third minute recovery QTcd values were 41.35 ± 7.27 ms, 65.19 ± 7.83 ms, and 53.61 ± 6.45 ms, respectively. In the control group, baseline, peak and third minute recovery QTcd values were 29.92 ± 4.23 ms, 38.31 ± 4.22 ms and 28.76 ± 3.09 ms, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the baseline and peak QTcd values of the study group and the control group (t = 8.34224/p 0.00001, t = 18.55079/p 0.00001, respectively). In addition, while there was a statistically significant difference between the baseline QTcd and the third minute recovery QTcd in the study group, there was no statistically significant difference between the baseline QTcd value and the third minute recovery QTcd value in the control group as heart rate recovery (t = 8.388558/p 0.00001, t = 1.967315/p = 0.056668, respectively). Conclusion: All of them were found to have a higher risk in terms of malignant ventricular arrhythmia in the study group, both at rest and with effort, in a statistically significant way compared to the control group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayhan et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Pseudoexfoliative Syndrome (n=75). Pseudoexfoliative Syndrome vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Peak exercise corrected QT dispersion (QTcd) (p=<0.00001). Patients with pseudoexfoliative syndrome exhibited significantly higher peak exercise corrected QT dispersion (65.19 ms vs 38.31 ms) and delayed recovery compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: