Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perovskite-structured solid solutions with compositions of 0.9963(1-x)(Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3–xBa(Cu1.1/3Nb2/3)O3 + 0.0037MnO2, with x = 0–0.06 [abbreviated as (1-x)BNT–xBCN)], were fabricated by normal sintering, and their structural, and piezo- and ferroelectric properties were investigated in detail. The X-ray diffraction profiles of the (1-x)BNT–xBCN solid solutions with x = 0–0.06 suggested that the rhombohedral-tetragonal morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) in this material system is in the compositional region x = 0.0425–0.0460. The cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns of the (1-x)BNT–xBCN samples with x = 0.0475 suggested that the present materials have a modulation structure arranged by a double period along the [111] direction. It is shown that the tetragonal BNT–BCN (x = 0.0475) solid solution with a composition of 0.9490BNT·0.0473BCN·0.0037MnO2 near the MPB has a piezoelectric coefficient (d 33), a relative permittivity (ε33 T/ε0), and a remanent polarization (P r) of approximately 1.8, 3.2, and 2.8 times larger, respectively, than those of the BNT solid solution without BCN substitution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobune et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: