To address the failure risks associated with long-term service of subsea Christmas tree-wellhead systems under the complex marine environment of the South China Sea, a multi-factor coupled mechanical analysis method is proposed to evaluate the system’s mechanical characteristics and ensure the safety of deepwater oil and gas production. A dynamic model of lateral vibration under seismic loading is established, considering the combined effects of earthquakes, ocean currents, and seabed soil resistance. Based on the actual operating parameters of a well in the Lingshui area of the South China Sea, a three-dimensional finite element model of the subsea Christmas tree-wellhead assembly was developed in ABAQUS 2023. The combined effects of ocean currents, seismic loading, and corrosion over long-term service were simulated to compute and analyze the distributions of stress, bending moment, and associated failure risk. The results indicate that, under a once-in-a-century current combined with seismic waves of intensity V–VI, the system risk remains controllable. However, when the seismic intensity exceeds level VII, the maximum stress and bending moment reach 324.9 MPa and 6.02 MN·m, respectively, surpassing the allowable limits for an X56-grade surface conductor. Considering corrosion effects over a 25-year service life, the extreme stress values increase by 1–5% while the bending moment increases slightly; corrosion significantly amplifies the system’s failure risk. An analysis of the mudline burial height of the subsea wellhead during long-term service shows that, within a range of 1–7 m, variations in system loading are minimal. Based on the mechanical characteristics analysis, it is recommended that the design of subsea Christmas trees and wellheads incorporate regional seismic history, specify X56-grade surface conductors to mitigate corrosion effects, and install leakage-monitoring devices at critical locations to ensure the long-term service safety of the subsea Christmas tree-wellhead system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: