Pediatric kidney transplant candidates often have multiple potential living donors (LDs); no evidence-based tool exists to compare potential LDs, or to decide between marginal LDs and deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation (KT). We developed a pediatric living kidney donor profile index (P-LKDPI) on the same scale as the DD KDPI by using Cox regression to model the risk of all-cause graft loss as a function of living donor characteristics and DD KDPI. HLA-B mismatch (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per mismatch= 1.04 1.27 1.55 ), HLA-DR mismatch (aHR per mismatch= 1.02 1.23 1.49 ), ABO incompatibility (aHR = 1.20 3.26 8.81 ), donor systolic blood pressure (aHR per 10 mm Hg= 1.01 1.07 1.18 ), and donor estimated GFR (eGFR; aHR per 10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 = 0.88 0.94 0.99 ) were associated with graft loss after LDKT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) P-LKDPI was −25 (−56 to 12). 68% of donors had P-LKDPI <0 (less risk than any DD kidney) and 25% of donors had P-LKDPI >14 (more risk than median DD kidney among pediatric KT recipients during the study period). Strata of LDKT recipients of kidneys with higher P-LKDPI had a higher cumulative incidence of graft loss (39% at 10 years for P-LDKPI ≥20, 28% for 20> P-LKDPI ≥−20, 23% for −20 > P-LKDPI ≥−60, 19% for P-LKDPI <−60 [log rank P < .001]). The P-LKDPI can aid in organ selection for pediatric KT recipients by allowing comparison of potential LD and DD kidneys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wasik et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: