suggesting that their peer review is relatively straightforward, but low concordance for the rest.Quality checklists available in the literature5 are inadequate to assess the wide variety of types of economic submissions as they are aimed at economic evaluations, which possibly make up a minority of the literature.More thought needs to be devoted to the importance and assessment of economic studies and other economic papers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loftus et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: