Key result
Coronary occlusion is generally the result of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, though the role of increased blood coagulability in ischemic heart disease remains disputed.
Discusses the dual role of atherosclerosis and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of coronary occlusion.
Atherosclerosis and thrombosis drive coronary occlusion; leaves open hypercoagulability's role in ischemic heart disease.
Coronary occlusion is generally the result of two distinct but often coincident processes: One, atherosclerosis, progresses slowly to produce narrowing; the other, thrombosis, often apparently sudden, completes the obstruction of the lumen. While atherosclerosis-thrombosis is the usual sequence in the pathogenesis of coronary occlusion, occasionally atheroma alone is the cause and, exceptionally, thrombosis complicates relatively minor intimal disease. This description of two separate factors producing coronary obstruction does not exclude the probability that certain phases of blood coagulation, ie, deposition of fibrin, platelets, or both, may contribute to the development of atherosclerosis, a thesis originally proposed by Rokitansky1and revived and documented by Duguid and others2-4who have found histologic evidence of incorporation of fibrin into atheromatous lesions. The part played by increased thrombogenic activity in the blood of patients with ischemic heart disease is disputed. While some authors5-7have reported increased coagulability based upon one or
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ira Gore (1964) conducted a review in Coronary occlusion. Coronary occlusion is generally the result of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, though the role of increased blood coagulability in ischemic heart disease remains disputed.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: