Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Organic (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), inorganic ions (Cl−, NO3−, SO42−, Na+, NH4+, K+, Ca2+), methanesulfonate (MSA−) and metals (Al, Fe, Pb, Mn, Ba, V) were monitored in PM1 and PM2.5 samples collected at a suburban site in south-eastern Italy, to contribute to the characterisation of fine particles in the Central Mediterranean. Mean mass concentrations are 13 µg/m3 and 22 µg/m3 in PM1 and PM2.5, respectively. OC, EC, SO42−, NH4+, NO3−, K+ and Ca2+ are predominant components and account for 54% and 56% of the PM1 and PM2.5 mass, respectively. OC, EC, SO42−, NH4+, K+ and Ca2+ concentrations lie in the range of the corresponding ones measured in PM1 and PM2.5 samples collected at suburban/urban Mediterranean sites. NO3− and trace element concentrations lie in the range of the corresponding ones measured in PM1 and PM2.5 samples collected at remote/background Mediterranean sites. The biogenic nss-SO42− accounts for ~5% and 4% of nss-SO42− in PM1 and PM2.5, respectively. The seasonal trend of the components partitioning and the interspecies correlation analysis in PM1 and PM2.5-1 indicated that the PM1 and PM2.5-1 components depend on season and are likely not controlled by similar sources, and/or similar generation processes, and/or similar transport patterns. The sulfur and nitrogen oxidation ratios were calculated to contribute to the understanding of the seasonal dependence of nitrate and sulfate concentrations in PM1 and PM2.5-1. The mass closure analysis showed that organic matter (OM), EC, and nitrate mass percentages are larger in autumn–winter. NH4+, nss-SO42−, and crustal matter mass percentages are larger in spring–summer. Finally, the ratio of the crustal matter in PM1 to that in PM2.5-1, which is 0.2 and 0.3 in spring–summer and autumn–winter, respectively, and the higher (OM+EC) contribution in PM1 than in PM2.5-1 led to the conclusion that PM1 would be a better indicator for fine-anthropogenic particles than PM2.5.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perrone et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: