Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The migration of lithium (Li) ions in electrode materials is an important factor affecting the rate performance of rechargeable Li ion batteries. We have examined Li migration in spinels LiMn(2)O(4), LiCo(2)O(4), and LiCo(1/16)Mn(15/16)O(4) by means of first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). The results showed that the trajectory of the Li jump was straight between the two adjacent Li ions for all of the three spinel compounds. However, there were significant differences in the energy profiles and the Li jump path for LiMn(2)O(4) and LiCo(2)O(4). For LiMn(2)O(4) the highest energy barrier was in the middle of the two tetrahedral sites, or in the octahedral vacancy (16c). For LiCo(2)O(4) the lowest energy was around the octahedral 16c site and the energy barrier was located at the bottleneck sites. The difference in the energy profile for LiCo(2)O(4) stemmed from the charge disproportion of Co(3.5+) to Co(3+)/Co(4+) caused by a Li vacancy forming and jumping, which was not observed for LiMn(2)O(4). Charge disproportion successfully accounted for the faster Li migration mechanism observed in LiCo(1/16)Mn(15/16)O(4). Our computational results demonstrate the importance of the effect of charge distribution on the ion jump.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakayama et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: