Reaction of the compound [Pt(PhC2Ph)2] with [Pt(C2H4)(PPh3)2] or [Pt2(µ-cod)(PEt3)4](cod = cyclo-octa-1,5-diene) affords diplatinum complexes [Pt2(µ-PhC2Ph)(PhC2Ph)(PR3)2](R = Ph or Et). The triphenylphosphine compound has also been prepared by treating PhCCPh with [Pt(C2H4)2(PPh3)]. The terminal alkyne ligand in [Pt2(µ-PhC2Ph)(PhC2Ph)(PPh3)2] bonds a third platinum atom on treatment with [Pt(C2H4)(PPh3)2] to give the triplatinum complex [Pt3(µ-PhC2Ph)2(PPh3)4]. The latter can also be prepared by addition of 2 mol equivalents of [Pt(C2H4)(PPh3)2 to [Pt(PhC2Ph)2], and the triethylphosphine-triplatinum analogue is similarly obtained using [Pt2(µ-cod)(PEt3)4]. In view of the novelty of these compounds, a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study has been carried out on [Pt3(µ-PhC2Ph)2(PEt3)4], crystals of which are monoclinic, space group C2/c(no. 15), with Z= 4 in a unit cell of dimensions a= 17.047(2), b= 13.677(2), c= 25.073(3)Å, and β= 105.79(1)°. The structure has been solved by heavy-atom methods from 3 038 intensity data [I 3.0σ(I)] measured on a four-circle diffractometer at 300 K, and refined to R 0.047 (R′ 0.046). The three platinum atoms adopt an open V-shaped configuration with an internuclear distance of 2.904Å and an interbond angle of 144°, while the acetylenic units form transverse bridges across the two Pt–Pt vectors on the convex side of the V. The phenyl groups bend away from the metal atoms to give a C–C–Ph angle of 139°, and the whole molecule is constrained crystallographically to C2 symmetry. The ethyl groups of the phosphine ligands are ill defined and possibly disordered.The diplatinum complexes [Pt2(µ-RC2R)(PMe3)4](R = Ph or C6F5) have also been prepared, and [Pt2(µ-PhC2Ph)(PEt3)4] characterised spectroscopically. Reaction of [Pt(PhC2Ph)(CNBut)2] with [Pt(C2H4)(PPh3)2] yields trans-[Pt2(µ-PhC2Ph)(CNBut)2(PPh3)2], scrambling of the CNBut and PPh3 ligands having occurred. The stereochemistry of this complex, and its PhCCC6H4OMe-4 analogue, has been established by 31P and 13C-labelling n.m.r. studies. The modes of formation of the various compounds are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boag et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: