Key result
Perioperative supplemental oxygen yielded a relative risk of surgical site infections of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97 for fixed-effect; 0.61-1.16 for random-effect) among all surgery patients.
Why the study?
Does perioperative supplemental oxygen reduce surgical site infections and mortality in surgery patients?
Meta-Analysis
Does perioperative supplemental oxygen reduce surgical site infections and mortality in surgery patients?
Relative Risk: 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.97)
Perioperative hyperoxia has a moderately high probability of modestly reducing surgical site infections, particularly in colorectal surgery, though potential harms remain inadequately addressed.
In Brief Objective: The purpose of this study is to use updated data and Bayesian methods to evaluate the effectiveness of hyperoxia to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) and/or mortality in both colorectal and all surgery patients. Because few trials assessed potential harms of hyperoxia, hazards were not included. Background: Use of hyperoxia to reduce SSIs is controversial. Three recent meta-analyses have had conflicting conclusions. Methods: A systematic literature search and review were performed. Traditional fixed-effect and random-effect meta-analyses and Bayesian meta-analysis were performed to evaluate SSIs and mortality. Results: Traditional meta-analysis yielded a relative risk of an SSI with hyperoxia among all surgery patients of 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–0.97] and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.61–1.16) for the fixed-effect and random-effect models, respectively. The probabilities of any risk reduction in SSIs among all surgery patients were 77%, 81%, and 83% for skeptical, neutral, and enthusiastic priors. The subset analysis of colorectal surgery patients increased the probabilities to 86%, 89%, and 92%. The probabilities of at least a 10% reduction were 57%, 62%, and 68% for all surgery patients and 71%, 75%, and 80% among the colorectal surgery subset. Conclusions: There is a moderately high probability of a benefit to hyperoxia in reducing SSIs in colorectal surgery patients; however, the magnitude of benefit is relatively small and might not exceed treatment hazards. Further studies should focus on generalizability to other patient populations or on treatment hazards and other outcomes. An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing perioperative supplemental oxygen or hyperoxia with normal concentrations of inspired oxygen was performed using both traditional and Bayesian methods. The results are consistent with a modest reduction in surgical site infections. However, harms, including mortality, have not been adequately addressed by existing trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kao et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Surgery patients (colorectal and all surgery). Perioperative supplemental oxygen (hyperoxia) vs. Normal concentrations of inspired oxygen was evaluated on Surgical site infections (SSIs) (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97). Perioperative supplemental oxygen yielded a relative risk of surgical site infections of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97 for fixed-effect; 0.61-1.16 for random-effect) among all surgery patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: