C4H10O2S2, Mr = 154.25, monoclinic, T = 87(1) K. (α) P21/n, a = 10.520(2), b = 5.818(1), c = 12.029(2) Å, β = 92.86(1)°, V = 735.3(2) Å3, Z = 4, Dx = 1.3934(4) Mgm−3, λ(MoKᾱ) = 0.71073 Å, μ = 0.617 mm−1, F(000) = 328, R = 0.023 for 2080 reflections. (β) P21/c, a = 10.413(1), b = 6.706(1), c = 10.229(1) Å, β = 94.32(2)°, V = 712.3(2) Å3, Z = 4, Dx = 1.4384(8) Mgm−3, λ(MoKᾱ) = 0.71073 Å, μ = 0.637 mm−1, F(000) = 328, R = 0.021 for 2007 reflections. The main conformational distinction between the two forms is the −synclinal and +synclinal orientation of the C(Me)–S–C–C in the thio end of the α and β forms, respectively. The bond lengths and angles are very similar in the two forms, and in good agreement with some related sulfone and sulfide structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1994 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: