The influence of the initial phase composition and crystallite size on the mechanical properties and the elastic behavior of oriented syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) was investigated. Two samples (A 25 and B 100 ) were crystallized from the melt respectively at 25 and 100 °C, obtaining the same crystalline forms but different morphologies, in terms of crystallinity, crystal dimensions, and phase composition. X-ray diffraction was used to determine the crystallinity and the crystal dimensions, whereas the vapor transport properties allowed to evidence and quantify the presence of an intermediate phase. Sample A 25 shows smaller crystals, lower crystallinity, and a lower amorphous fraction but a larger mesomorphic component as compared to B 100 . The two samples were then stretched to a draw ratio of 7. They showed very different stress−strain curves, which appear to correlate with the initial structure. On releasing the tension both fibers undergo a large shrinkage, reaching λ = 4. The presence of the trans-planar form III and of the trans-planar mesophase characterize the fiber A 25 at λ = 7 while upon relaxation only the trans-planar mesophase and a small fraction of an oriented helical polymorph are apparent. In the fully extended fiber B 100 well-oriented form III and small amounts of a modestly oriented helical form were evidenced. The relaxed fiber B 100 contains an essentially unchanged crystalline helical component along with the trans-planar mesophase. Stress−strain cycles of fibers A 25 and B 100 allowed the determination of the hysteresis curves and the permanent set. The stress−strain data were evaluated in terms of the Mooney−Rivlin equation and show for fiber B 100, with a more substantial, less constrained amorphous fraction and larger crystals, a more traditional elastomeric behavior. The permanent set is similar for the two samples, but A 25, characterized by smaller crystallites, more intimately connected with the amorphous and a larger intermediate phase component, shows both higher modulus and strain hardening. This features appear related to the limited extensibility of the chains forming the elastic network of A 25 and to its capacity to crystallize under stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guadagno et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: