Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The 27-, 30-, and 33-kDa rod linker polypeptides and the 75-kDa core linker of phycobilisomes from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 have been reported to be glycoproteins with carbohydrate contents ranging from 3.2 to 18.8% and composed of N-acetylgalactosamine and glucose (H.C. Riethman, T.P. Mawhinney, and L.A. Sherman, J. Bacteriol. 170:2433-2440, 1988). Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 phycobilisomes were purified extensively, and the linker polypeptides were separated from the phycobiliproteins by precipitation in 1 M NaSCN. Upon hydrolysis, the linker fraction yielded 0.037% glucose and 0.015% galactosamine by weight and no other carbohydrate. Phycobilisome polypeptides separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate were subjected to various glycoprotein-specific staining procedures. Linker polypeptides showed very weak concanavalin A binding and no staining by the Schiff-periodate method or by a much more sensitive periodate oxidation-based method. These results indicated that the linker polypeptides are not glycosylated. An earlier report (T. Fujiwara, J. Biochem. 49:361-367, 1961) contended, on the basis of the isolation of sugar-containing peptic chromopeptides from Porphyra tenera R-phycoerythrin, that this red algal phycobiliprotein is a glycoprotein. Analysis of Gastroclonium coulteri R-phycoerythrin and Porphyridium cruentum B-phycoerythrin revealed only traces of carbohydrate in these two proteins, 0.36 and 0.14%, respectively. Results of glycoprotein staining of gels suggested that the carbohydrate in the R-phycoerythrin preparation is due to a glycoprotein contaminant and that neither red algal phycoerythrin is glycosylated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fairchild et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: