Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spray drift and off-target losses are inherent problems of conventional air-assisted sprayers; consequently, their low efficiencies cause environmental pollution and public anxiety. A new drift reduction technology incorporating laser scanning capabilities with a variable-rate air-assisted sprayer was developed to address these problems. This new sprayer, the same sprayer with the variable-rate function disabled, and a conventional constant-rate air-blast sprayer were tested for comparison of spray drift and off-target losses in an apple orchard. Tests were conducted at three different growth stages: trees just beginning to leaf (leafing), half foliage, and full foliage. Spray deposits from spray drift and off-target losses were collected within tree rows at ground level, above and behind the sprayed trees, in the spaces between trees, and from 3.2 m tall poles at 5, 15, and 35 m from the tree rows. Compared to the constant-rate sprayers, the laser-guided variable-rate sprayer reduced average spray losses on the ground by 68% to 90% and around tree canopies by 70% to 92%, reduced airborne spray drift by 70% to 100%, and most importantly, reduced the spray volume by 47% to 73%, while spray deposition quality inside the canopy for these sprayers was comparable. These results demonstrate that the variable-rate sprayer incorporating the innovative laser scanning technology reduced spray drift and off-target losses of pesticides, was environmentally sustainable, and was economically beneficial to growers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: