Key result
EVAR was associated with a higher rate of remote complications requiring reinterventions (21.1%) compared to open surgery (4.6%), despite no significant difference in long-term mortality.
Why the study?
Does EVAR using the Zenith stentgraft reduce mortality or complications compared to open surgery in patients undergoing elective AAA repair?
Observational (n=237)
No
Does EVAR using the Zenith stentgraft reduce mortality or complications compared to open surgery in patients undergoing elective AAA repair?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.1% vs 4.6%
While EVAR and open surgery have similar long-term mortality for AAA repair, EVAR is associated with a higher rate of late complications requiring reintervention.
May warrant surveillance for late reinterventions after EVAR; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: Our study focuses on the long term result of open surgery and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith stentgraft. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 237 patients underwent elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair between April 1999 and December 2006. Nineteen patients underwent EVAR, whereas 218 patients underwent open surgery. The mean follow-up time for EVAR group was 73.8 ± 49 months (range; 25-150 months), and 69.7 ± 46 months (range; 1-156 months) for open surgery group. RESULTS: One open surgery patient (1/218, 0.46%) died of aspiration pneumonia, whereas all the EVAR patients survived the operation. Remote complications requiring reintervention occurred in 8 patients (8/174, 4.6%) in open surgery group. Six EVAR patients (6/19, 31.6%) developed late aneurysm expansion, among whom four patients (4/19, 21.1%) required reinterventions after 3 or more years postoperatively. The need for reintervention persisted even at 11 years after initial EVAR. There was no significant intergroup difference in late mortality. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in early and long term mortality. Complications requiring reinterventions, however, were more frequent in EVAR than in open surgery, especially in the late period. Long term follow-up is mandatory for comparison of the clinical results between open surgery and EVAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n=237). Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using Zenith stentgraft vs. Conventional open AAA repair was evaluated on Remote complications requiring reintervention. EVAR was associated with a higher rate of remote complications requiring reinterventions (21.1%) compared to open surgery (4.6%), despite no significant difference in long-term mortality.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: