Our study analyzed 831 non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients admitted from January 2007 to January 2023, using 665 for creating and 166 for validating the CKD-Infectious Inflammation (CKD-INF) score. This score distinguishes inflammation types using logistic regression outcomes and aligns with the International Sepsis Definition Conference criteria. The study’s participants had an average age of 76.2 ± 11.2 years, with 37% female and over half diagnosed with diabetes. The resulting score was as follows: $${gathered} {CKD} - {INF} = 1.8*{CRP}( {{mg}/{L}} ) + 3.3*{NLR} + 7.9*{WBC}( {{K}/{{ L}}} ) \\ \;\;\; + 172.1*{Fever} ≥ 38\,{^∘ }{C}( {{no} = 0,{yes} = 1} ), \\ {gathered}$$ where NLR refers to the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, CRP to C-reactive protein, and WBC indicates white blood cell count. CKD-INF exhibited a higher AUC of 0.85 (with a 95% CI of 0.82–0.87), higher sensitivity (75.3%) and specificity (82%) compared to its components including CRP. The CKD-INF score showed higher weighted κ values (0.57) for infection prediction at hospital admission than its individual components. In both training and validation groups, the CKD-INF score outperformed CRP as a predictor of infection in univariate and multivariate analyses. The CKD-INF score, derived from routine laboratory tests, can be an effective tool for predicting infections in CKD patients, potentially aiding in their early management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beberashvili et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: