Multi-agent localization is a basic requirement for many networked applications. The particular application to swarming unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or munitions requires spatial coordination of agents, including the ability to assume and maintain a prescribed flight formation. An in-flight awareness of network morphology and node location is therefore needed. While global navigation satellite systems offer an attractive solution, signal occlusion, spoofing, and jamming present unacceptable vulnerabilities-particularly for mission-critical operations. Alternative network localization methods using inter-agent radio frequency ranging and Angle of Arrival have been well studied over the past 15 years, but existing algorithms are not well suited to fast-moving networks. Iterative methods tend to converge slowly. Faster noniterative multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) methods for range, bearing, or vector measurements have also been formulated. However, these MDS methods generally require the full pairwise inter-agent measurement matrix-placing a severe requirement on swarm connectivity and leading to low tolerance for missing or badly estimated measurements. Even vector-based MDS, which incorporates both range and direction constraints, is shown here to require 4-vertex connectivity to achieve perfect localization. Results from rigidity theory, however, suggest that a lower connectivity threshold should be sufficient to guarantee a unique configuration (up to translation and rotation). In contrast, our proposed “vertex resequencing” and “edge resequencing” techniques further lower the vertex-connectivity threshold to 3 and 2, respectively. These localization techniques, which extend vector-based MDS with Nyström approximation, prescribe a graph-based kernel sampling scheme and weighted coordinate reconstruction that suppress the effect of missing measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moshe Hamaoui (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: