In summary, when we avoid the temptation to assume the ceteris paribus opener, and allow for systematic differences in the characteristics of LIFO and FIFO firms, we can view this paper in a different light. Rather that presenting anomalous or puzzling findings, it instead provides evidence of another dimension along which LIFO and FIFO firms may systematically differ; a dimension which appears consistent with several existing theories of accounting choice and with previous empirical findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gary C. Biddle (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: