Key result
The identification of the dystrophin protein in 1987 provided key tools to understand Duchenne muscular dystrophy genetics and molecular pathology, leading to molecular therapeutics.
Why the study?
Duchenne muscular dystrophy was a genetic enigma with unanswered questions regarding its high mutation rate, relentless progression of muscle wasting after early childhood, and underlying muscle pathology.
This historical perspective outlines the discovery of dystrophin and its impact on understanding and treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Dystrophin identification clarifies DMD molecular basis; leaves open targeted therapies for progressive muscle wasting.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy was a well-established medical and genetic enigma by the 1970s. Why was the new mutation rate so high in all world populations? Why were affected boys doing well in early childhood, but then showed relentless progression of muscle wasting? What was wrong with the muscle? The identification of the first fragments of DMD gene cDNA in 1986, prediction of the entire 3685 amino acid protein sequence, and production of antibodies to dystrophin, both in 1987, provided key tools to understand DMD genetics and molecular pathology. The identification of dystrophin nucleated extensive research on myofiber membrane cytoskeleton, membrane repair, muscle regeneration, and failure of regeneration. This in turn led to molecular therapeutics based on understanding of dystrophin structure and function. This historical perspective describes the events surrounding the initial identification of the dystrophin protein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric P. Hoffman (2020) conducted a review in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Discovery of dystrophin was evaluated. The identification of the dystrophin protein in 1987 provided key tools to understand Duchenne muscular dystrophy genetics and molecular pathology, leading to molecular therapeutics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from FEBS Journal