Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The mechanistic roles of Ca 2+ and SO 4 2− as key ions governing hydration kinetics and gypsum‐based materials performance remain unresolved. Ion‐specific effects of exogenous Ca 2+ /SO 4 2− on α‐calcium sulfate hemihydrate (α‐HH) hydration were systematically examined through thermokinetic analysis, experimental validation, and molecular dynamics simulations. Hydration acceleration was not induced by Ca 2+ , whereas SO 4 2− demonstrated concentration‐dependent enhancement. The Krstulović−Dabić model revealed that the hydration process transitions from nucleation and crystal growth to interphase reactions and diffusion control. While both ions enhanced the thermodynamic driving force, Ca 2+ retarded hydration kinetics by inhibiting the dissolution process via the common ion effect and adsorption onto the HH surface. In contrast, under high supersaturation, SO 4 2− dynamically promoted dissolution by accelerating nucleation and crystal growth, thereby maintaining a high supersaturation level. The elevated SO 4 2− concentration in later stages further alleviated diffusion‐controlled limitations, enhancing overall hydration kinetics. This ion‐specific mechanism led to microstructural differences: exogenous Ca 2+ resulted in coarsened calcium sulfate dihydrate crystals and a 21% decrease in compressive strength, whereas SO 4 2− promoted refined, densely interlocked crystals and a 16% strength increase compared to the control. The elucidated mechanism provides critical guidance for regulating hydration, tailoring microstructure, and optimizing performance in gypsum‐based materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: