Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relative L−Au bond dissociation enthalpies of [Au(L)Cl] (L = tetrahydrothiophene (tht), PCy n Ph (3− n ), [1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yldicyclohexylphosphine (Cy-JohnPhos), dicyclohexyl(2′,6′-dimethoxy[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)phosphine (SPhos), dicyclohexyl[2′,4′,6′-tris(1-methylethyl)[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl]phosphine (XPhos), P(OPh) 3, P(O-2,4- t Bu 2 Ph) 3, P(O i Pr) 3, and the two enantiomers of 1,1′,1′′-[phosphinidynetris[oxy-(1- S / R )-[1,1′-binaphthalene]-2′,2-diyl]] tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decane-1-carboxylic acid ester) are examined. These enthalpic values are examined in terms of the intrinsic steric and electronic properties of the ancillary ligand. Estimates of the absolute BDE for the investigated ligands are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortman et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: