This paper offers a simulation analysis of firm strategies which differ by the degree of absorbing technical know-how generated elsewhere. It investigates the success of those firm strategies in a hetergeneous oligopoly setting in which firms compete by introducing new products and processes. Simulation results show that building up absorptive capacities tends to be a superior strategy in technologically heterogeneous environments. Reducing spillover effects leads to a slowdown of technological progress because cross-fertilization effects are of minor relevance. Where market competition is reduced the absorptive strategy tends to be only technologically superior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cantner et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: