Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Detailed computer calculations of angle-resolved photoemission are used to demonstrate that experimental data on Ni(110) and Cu(100) show effects that are found in the single-step model of photoemission, but not contained in the usual three-step model. In particular, the effect of inelastic scattering on the widths and shapes of direct-transition peaks is investigated directly and compared with simple line-shape formulas which are derived from the theory. Constant-initial-state spectra provide a particularly useful method for the determination of the inelastic scattering in the upper state. However, direct interpretation by a Lorentz-curve fit may overestimate the inelastic scattering slightly, since a somewhat smaller value is obtained by comparing the experiment with detailed calculations. Proper interpretation of the nickel data requires that the upper-state bands should be calculated including a damping due to inelastic scattering. Surface-matching effects appear to influence the shape of direct-transition peaks in copper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jepsen et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: