The flexural performance of reinforced concrete-filled glass-fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) tubes (CFFTs) has been investigated using seven specimens, 220mm in diameter and 2.43m long. Specimens were reinforced with either steel, GFRP, or carbon–fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) rebar of various sizes. Prefabricated GFRP tubes with most of the fibers oriented in the hoop direction were used in five specimens. One control specimen included conventional steel spirals of stiffness comparable to the GFRP tube and the other had no transverse reinforcement. Test results have shown that CFFT beams performed substantially better than beams with a steel spiral. Unlike CFFTs with FRP rebar, CFFTs with steel rebar failed in a sequential progressive manner, leading to considerable ductility. An analytical model capable of predicting the full response of reinforced CFFT beams, including the sequential progressive failure, has been developed, verified, and used in a parametric study. It is shown that laminate structure of the tube affects the behavior, only after yielding of the steel rebar. Steel reinforcement ratio significantly affects stiffness and strength, whereas concrete strength has an insignificant effect on the overall performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cole et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: