Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A total of 347 blue-autofluorescent colonies on roll tube cultures were transferred individually for isolation in order to examine methanogenic flora in a subtropical paddy field after application of organic matter with three treatments (control soil, straw-amended soil, and cellulose-amended soil). Two hundred and three strains showed a positive reaction for methane production. However, only 36 strains were found to be pure. Among the 36 pure methanogenic isolates, 19 utilized H2-CO2 as sole source for energy and carbon for growth, 17 utilized H2-CO2 and formate, and none utilized methanol and acetate. All 36 isolates were rods distinguishable into three groups by cell morphology: group 1, irregularly crooked long rods; group 2, gently curved long (or very long) rods; and group 3, relatively straight long (or very long) rods. Three isolates, strains 3544-4 and 6544-9 of group 2 and 5544-3 of group 3, were identified as Methanobacterium spp. by partial sequencing analysis of 16S rRNA. The partial 16S rRNA sequence of strain 6544-9 was identical to that of Methanobacterium bryantii. The other three isolates which belonged to group 1, strains 3543-10, 3544-9, and 6132-1, seemed to represent a new species within the genus Methanobacterium or probably Methanobrevibacter. Each of the pure isolates from control and straw-amended soil belonged to group 1. It is suggested that the group 1 methanogens are characterized as a geographically interesting indigenous type in the subtropical paddy field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsuki Adachi (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: