Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review traces computational methods in multi-period financial planning, highlighting reinforcement learning as a scalable bridge across stochastic optimization constraints.
Financial planning is rarely a one-shot decision: today’s saving, spending, and investment choices shape tomorrow’s wealth, liabilities, and goal attainment. This survey traces the mathematical evolution of multi-period financial planning over the past several decades, focusing on selected key methods ranging from classical stochastic optimization to learning-enabled decision systems. We begin with Markowitz’s single-period mean–variance optimization and trace the field’s evolution toward two major multi-period optimization paradigms: scenario-based approaches, such as multi-stage stochastic programming (MSP), and state-space approaches, including model-based dynamic programming (DP) and model-free reinforcement learning (RL). While traditional MSP and DP provide the mathematical backbone for sequential financial decision-making, their practical application has long been constrained by the curse of dimensionality, model misspecification, and restrictive assumptions required for tractability. Recent advances in model-free RL create new opportunities for adaptive and scalable sequential decision-making without relying on rigid transition models or handcrafted scenario trees. Building on this foundation, we review recent RL applications in multi-period financial planning for both individuals and institutions and classify the literature into three roles: hybrid RL, scalable RL, and end-to-end RL. Finally, we discuss the evolving landscape of AI/ML-driven automated investing, highlighting its promise for algorithmic financial planning as well as key challenges regarding data, interpretability, trust, and regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: