Cross-sectional study finds prolonged exposure heightens noise and light annoyance in urban residents, suggesting noise pollution uniquely impairs psychological habituation over time.
Background: Residential environmental stressors, such as noise and light pollution, significantly impact psychological well-being.While individual sensitivity and cognitive perception are known to influence environmental annoyance, how these factors operate differently across auditory and visual modalities over the long term remains poorly understood.Objectives: This study investigated the determinants of annoyance induced by environmental noise (auditory) and light pollution (visual) by comparing the impact of individual sensitivity and cognitive perception on long-term psychological responses.Methods: Data collected from 179 residents were analyzed using logistic regression and interaction pattern analysis.The study specifically examined the roles of residence duration, modality-specific sensitivity, and the alignment between subjective cognitive evaluation and actual psychological reactions.Results: Residence duration emerged as the most potent predictor of annoyance, with long-term residence (≥5 years) exhibiting the highest odds ratios for both noise (OR=2.53)and light (OR=2.92).Although the interaction terms were not statistically significant, the descriptive interaction patterns suggested possible modality-specific tendencies that require confirmation though future studies: sensitivity accelerated vulnerability under auditory stress but showed reversed or diminished effects under visual stress.Furthermore, a distinct discrepancy occurred between cognitive evaluation and psychological reaction; in the 'Unconcerned' group (favorable environmental evaluators), noise annoyance reached 57% at ≥5 years of residence, indicating a failure of subjective habituation, whereas light annoyance remained stable at 22%. Conclusions:The findings suggest that noise sensitivity may operate as an auditory-specific trait, and that the intrusive nature of noise could potentially weaken cognitive defense mechanisms, thereby contributing to chronic psychological costs.This study underscores the potential necessity of modality-specific urban policies that address the duration-dependent effects of exposure and the distinct characteristics of auditory versus visual stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: