Legal analysis reveals anti-abuse rule thresholds in cross-border dividend distributions, highlighting standards when recipients are beneficial owners rather than conduit firms.
In this note, the author presents the most recent dividend anti-abuse case before the Court of Justice of the European Union (Neo Group (C-203/25)), including its facts, the position of the parties before the national court and an analysis of the recently published Opinion of Advocate General Kokott. This case is expected to further develop the conditions for the application of the anti-abuse rule established by the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96), especially in cases where the recipient of the dividends, in contrast to the situation in the Danish Cases (C-116/16 and C-117/16), is not a conduit company and is a beneficial owner of the dividends.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aistė Medelienė (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: