Cross-sectional study finds low genital Chlamydia suis shedding alongside widespread tetracycline resistance in sows, suggesting routine antibiotic treatment lacks clinical benefit.
Porcine genital chlamydiosis is considered a potential cause of reproductive failure, with Chlamydia (C.) suis being the most prevalent chlamydial species. To assess its pathogenic relevance, 50 Austrian piglet-producing farms were investigated: 40 farms with reproductive disorders (20 with tetracycline-treatment (tet), 20 without (no-tet)) and 10 clinically unaffected control farms. Samples from 770 sows (tet: n = 333, no-tet: n = 337, control: n =100) including blood, cervical and rectal swabs, dust samples and one pooled nursery fecal sample per farm were analyzed. Thirty-seven reproductive-tracts and six abortion cases were examined. Species-specific real-time PCR detected cervical C. suis shedding in 2.1% of sows (tet: n =5, no-tet: n = 10, control: n = 1). Rectal shedding was found on 45 farms and in 39.7% of sows overall (tet: n = 37.8%, no-tet: n = 39.2%, control: n = 48%). C. pecorum DNA was identified in one cervical and seven rectal swabs. Chlamydiaceae -specific antibodies were detected by complement fixation test on all farms and in 49.8% of sows overall, without association between study group and shedding or serological status. C. suis DNA was detected in 28% of dust and 96% of nursery fecal samples, whereas reproductive tract and abortion material were largely PCR-negative. Analyzing 42 C. suis isolates high rates of tetracycline resistance were found in all study groups via tetA(C) PCR (tet: n = 93.75%, no-tet: n = 78.3%, control: n = 100%) and in vitro susceptibility testing (tet: n = 75%, no-tet: n = 60.8%, control: n = 100%). Parity had negative effects on clinical signs, rectal shedding and antibody expression. C. suis appears to play a limited role in reproductive failure, while routine tetracycline treatment should be critically reconsidered due to frequent resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baumgartner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: