Engineering study demonstrates substrate-derived automated mixing schedules in a fixed-dome biodigester, indicating enhanced stability against acid shocks and lower energy demand.
The automation of biodigesters using programmable logic controllers (PLCs) is well established, yet mixing schedules are configured empirically, regardless of substrate characteristics. This study proposes a Substrate-Driven PLC Control (SD-PLC) methodology for fixed-dome biodigesters, in which every timing setpoint is derived from a measured substrate property: the homogenization pulse from the rheological mixing time (Metzner–Otto regime), the maintenance interval from a stratification and a substrate–biomass contact criterion, the duty-cycle ceiling from a net energy balance, and a safety gate from acid–base behavior (pH/EC). The methodology is instantiated on a 13.86 m3 fixed-dome biodigester in the Chillón Valley (Lima, Peru), co-digesting organic waste and guinea pig manure (30:70; theoretical methane potential 371 mL CH4 g−1 VS; field conversion ≈ 21%). The impeller operates in the transitional regime (Re≈0.9–2.6×103), the homogenization pulse is ≈22 min, and the reconciled duty cycle (δ≈0.13) remains a factor of four below the energy ceiling (δ*≈0.56). An influence × feasibility matrix identifies a low-cost sensor set (pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, level) that gates mixing. A reduced COD-based dynamic model shows that, under acid shock, continuous mixing suppresses methanogenesis through shear while the absence of mixing fails through contact deficit, so that only the stability-first strategy preserves the process. The principal contribution is the methodology itself—a reproducible mapping from substrate characterization to PLC timing design—rather than the hardware.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álvarez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: