Psychometric validation reveals a stable two-factor scale for suspension of disbelief across diverse cohorts, indicating a distinct individual-difference trait.
Suspension of dis/belief (Sd/B) refers to temporarily withholding truth evaluation to engage with fictional, hypothetical, or counter-attitudinal information. Although Sd/B is widely invoked across media, education, and social cognition, research has relied on context-bound measures tied to specific media or settings, such as film, gaming, virtual reality, or simulation-based learning. We developed and validated a brief self-report instrument assessing how frequently individuals report engaging in behaviors that require Sd/B (the Sd/B Chronicity Scale). Across three studies in Portugal and the United States (N = 854), exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported a stable two-factor structure (Fictional Sd/B and Social Sd/B) with good internal consistency in Portuguese and English. In six additional independent samples (N = 1083), Sd/B showed a coherent nomological profile: strong associations with Openness to Experience, moderate links with Need for Cognition, narrative transportation, and cognitive empathy, and smaller positive associations with print exposure and mental-state recognition. Sd/B was largely unrelated to overall Need for Closure but showed the expected negative link with closed-mindedness. Together, findings support Sd/B as a coherent individual-difference construct and provide a concise instrument for research on how people navigate the boundary between belief and imagination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loureiro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: