Prospective study demonstrates 0.55 T MRI achieves higher disease detection and reader agreement than chest radiography in cystic fibrosis, suggesting a feasible radiation-free monitoring option.
Background: Lung surveillance in cystic fibrosis (CF) relies on chest radiography (CR) despite cumulative radiation. Low-field MRI may be a radiation-free alternative for children and young adults. Methods: We prospectively compared 0.55 T MRI and CR in 28 same-day examinations of 22 people with CF (mean age 13 ± 5 years). Three raters scored the disease with the MRI CF score and a modified Chrispin–Norman score, expanded from two to three zones per hemithorax to match the six MRI lobes. Analyses used per-examination values averaged across the raters (Wilcoxon tests, intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC). Results: MRI yielded higher global scores (median 8.2 vs. 6.7, p = 0.002) and higher centrilobular opacity scores (p = 0.005, adjusted p = 0.03). Air trapping was also higher on MRI (p = 0.025) but not after correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted p = 0.12). The other categories did not differ. Both correlated inversely with FEV1 (p < 0.001), without a significant modality-by-FEV1 interaction (p = 0.08). Interobserver agreement was higher for MRI (ICC = 0.93) than CR (0.82), difference 0.12 (95% bootstrap CI 0.06 to 0.18). The findings held in a per-participant sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: 0.55 T MRI is a feasible, radiation-free alternative to CR in CF, yielding higher modality-specific scores and more consistent interobserver agreement. Because the instruments were only category-mapped and no CT reference was available, higher scores do not establish superior lesion detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayerl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: