Mathematical analysis demonstrates two-term asymptotic expansions for nonlinear Caputo relaxation equations, indicating distinct regimes of memory and constitutive dominance.
We derive two‑term asymptotic expansions for nonlinear Caputo relaxation while isolating the recent‑history concentration that first‑order regular variation does not control. Under a terminal uniform‑integrability condition, the Caputo dissipation retains its finite‑initial‑value term and has an explicit memory correction. Ultimate convexity and a local derivative bound are sufficient for this condition, whereas a plateau–catch‑up construction proves that bare regular variation is insufficient. For a restoring law \(φ(x) = cxβ\{1 + axσ + o(xσ)\}\), the state satisfies \(u(t) ~ K t-α/β\). Its first relative correction has order \(t-ασ/β\) when \(σ < 1\) and order \(t-α/β\) when \(σ ≥ 1\), separating constitutive dominance, resonance, and memory dominance. For the exact‑power law, the coefficient changes sign at \(α = β/(β + 1)\); the same sign determines whether the corrected residual hitting time is earlier or later than its leading estimate. At \(T = 3000\), implicit L1 diagnostics recover the subcritical and supercritical state coefficients within \(0.85%\) and \(4.6%\), respectively, and the resonant coefficient within \(1%\). These computations support the predicted signs and scales but do not replace the analytical endpoint hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grienggrai Rajchakit (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: