Computational modeling reveals concurrent rainfall and pseudo-static seismic motions amplify tailings dam failure risk by up to two orders of magnitude, highlighting compound hazard vulnerabilities.
Tailings dam failures pose catastrophic risks to downstream communities and ecosystems, yet conventional stability assessments rarely account for the coincident effects of rainfall and pseudo-static motions or the spatial variability of soil properties. This study proposes a reliability analysis framework integrating unsaturated seepage simulation, random field modeling, and an XGBoost surrogate model to evaluate transient factor of safety (FoS) and failure probability under coupled hazards. A tailings dam case study shows that the timing of minimum FoS under advanced rainfall shifts from rainfall cessation to during-rainfall when cumulative rainfall exceeds 100 mm. Neither moderate rainfall (40 mm) nor pseudo-static action ( k h =0.05) alone induces instability, but their concurrency drives the dam to a critical state. Incorporating horizontal pseudo-static force uncertainty increases failure probability by up to 2 orders of magnitude under 40 mm rainfall. Beyond conventional wisdom, our results identify a 100-mm rainfall threshold governing peak risk timing under advanced rainfall patterns, and quantify the significant failure probability amplification driven by pseudo-static uncertainty. The XGBoost surrogate model achieves a validation R 2 of 0.78 for FoS prediction and ~ 95% computational savings versus traditional Monte Carlo simulation, providing a robust, generalizable tool for reliability assessment of tailings dams and other geotechnical systems under compound hazards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: