Policy review reveals systemic backlogs and digital emerging threats in the Indian justice system, highlighting the necessity for citizen-centric and technological reforms.
The Indian judiciary is a fundamental pillar of democracy and plays a vital role in protecting constitutional values, individual rights, and the rule of law. However, the justice delivery system faces several contemporary challenges, including judicial delay, increasing case pendency, vacancies in judicial posts, procedural barriers, high litigation costs, inadequate infrastructure, cybercrime, digital privacy concerns, and the need for greater judicial accountability. Technological advancement has further created new legal challenges involving cyber fraud, data protection, identity theft, deepfake technology, and artificial intelligence-related offences. This paper examines the major contemporary legal issues affecting the Indian judiciary and discusses possible reforms for improving the efficiency, accessibility, transparency, and fairness of the justice delivery system. It emphasizes measures such as reducing case arrears, harmonizing court fees, regulating legal costs, strengthening judicial infrastructure, ensuring transparent selection of judges, revisiting procedural and limitation rules, and improving judicial accountability. The paper also examines the evolving role of the judiciary in policy control and the importance of epistolary jurisdiction in providing access to justice for disadvantaged sections of society. The study concludes that judicial reforms must be citizen-centric, technologically responsive, accessible, and consistent with the constitutional commitment to equal justice and the rule of law.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swati Gajendra Shinde (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: