Qualitative longitudinal study uncovers three distinct resource transition pathways in near-retirees, highlighting the need for personalized post-career support beyond financial planning.
Background and Objectives Retirement transition (RT) is a dynamic process with individual heterogeneity. While the Resource-Based Dynamic Perspective (RBDP) highlights fluctuations in key resources, studies remain largely quantitative and cross-sectional. This study aims to identify distinct RT patterns and examine shifts in resource-related discourse over time. Research Design and Methods A qualitative longitudinal design with computational augmentation tracked 12 Taiwanese near-retirees across five waves spanning six months pre- to six months post-retirement. Sixty qualitative transcripts were analyzed using longitudinal case methods, complemented by computational text mining (Sentence-BERT) to trace trajectories across six resource domains, including Health Issues, Life Control, Financial Status, Social Support, Emotional Response, and Lifestyle. Results Within this sample, three analytically derived RT patterns were observed: a transition-centered pattern in Strategic Goal-Driven (Type I, n = 4), a U-shaped pattern in Structure and Social Role Reshaping (Type II, n = 4), and a crisis-driven peak in External Shock Response (Type III, n = 4). Text-mining results broadly converged with qualitative findings, particularly in the Life Control domain. At the individual level, convergence was observed for financial status and lifestyle, whereas divergence emerged when similar quantitative frequencies corresponded to different qualitative meanings. Discussion and Implications Findings extend RBDP by introducing resource diversion, in which family or contextual demands redirect personal resources, and a resource hierarchy highlighting the foundational role of physical health. Findings underscore the need for pathway-specific retirement support that accounts for culturally embedded caregiving obligations beyond conventional financial-planning approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: