Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative interview study reveals how non-governmental safety standards exert binding control over firefighter protective gear, highlighting major transparency and occupational health challenges.
How do non-governmental standards matter for occupational and environmental health and safety? Internationally recognized standards specify requirements for structural firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE), but concerns have emerged about hazardous chemicals and firefighters’ potential exposures. In this paper, we draw on the case of the National Fire Protection Association's standards for firefighter PPE to develop the concept of peri-governance , work done by non-governmental actors or organizations that exerts governance force through various mechanisms, including government entities. We conducted qualitative interviews with firefighters, industry representatives, activists, and other experts to identify firefighter and union concerns related to the development of PPE standards, and advocacy related to those concerns. We find that peri-governmental standards can exert essentially binding influence over sectors of society through four mechanisms: formal regulatory and legal requirements, fear of legal liability, insurance requirements, and universal uptake by relevant users. Peri-governance raises specific concerns about transparency, fairness, and public–private interactions, making the concept useful in examining other standards and governance more broadly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mok et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: