Retrospective case series demonstrates reduced proptosis and restored vision in Graves orbitopathy, indicating secondary bony decompression rescues patients after failed fat decompression.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of secondary bony decompression following primary fat decompression. Design: Retrospective interventional case series. Methods: Setting: A tertiary university hospital. Study Population: A total of 27 eyes from 17 patients who underwent secondary inferomedial orbital wall decompression following primary orbital fat decompression were included. Patients with a history of trauma, extraocular muscle surgery, prior orbital irradiation, or eyelid or orbital inflammation within 6 months prior to decompression were excluded. Intervention Procedure: Secondary inferomedial orbital wall decompression performed for recurrent proptosis or compressive optic neuropathy after primary fat decompression. Main Outcome Measure: Changes in Hertel value, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: Primary orbital fat decompression achieved an initial proptosis reduction of 3.4 ± 0.1 mm in 27 eyes. Secondary bony decompression was subsequently performed in 15 eyes from 9 patients with recurrent proptosis and in 12 eyes from 8 patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Secondary bony decompression resulted in a reduction in Hertel measurement by 4.5 ± 2.1 mm, improving from 21.7 ± 2.8 mm to 17.3 ± 1.6 mm ( P < 0.001) at a follow-up period of 40.6 ± 28.7 months. BCVA in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy improved from 0.43 ± 0.3 to 0.12 ± 0.15 logMAR ( P = 0.005). Diplopia occurred in 12 of 17 patients (70%), including five with new-onset diplopia. Preoperative diplopia predicted postoperative diplopia in regression analysis. Conclusion: Secondary inferomedial orbital wall decompression following primary orbital fat decompression effectively reduces proptosis and improves vision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: