System evaluation demonstrates reduced gas costs and enhanced dispute resolution in decentralized e-commerce transactions, highlighting a secure model for fraud prevention.
Key Points
To develop and evaluate a regulated decentralized e-commerce framework that addresses privacy vulnerabilities, arbitrator accountability, and uncompensated dispute resolution.
Engineered a compensating mutually assured destruction game-theoretic mechanism coupled with decoupled 2-of-2 and 2-of-3 multisignature smart contract architectures.
Implemented a privacy-preserving real-name commitment exchange protocol with conditional identity disclosure and compatibility for zk-SNARK integration.
Evaluated the prototype on the Ethereum testnet to benchmark gas consumption, storage overhead, and high-concurrency transaction scheduling performance.
The game-theoretic mechanism mathematically guarantees that penalties for fraudulent parties exceed illegal gains while providing full financial restitution to honest victims.
Experimental deployment on Ethereum yielded lower gas consumption and reduced on-chain storage demands relative to state-of-the-art decentralized transaction schemes.
The concurrency scheduling strategy resolved smart contract lock contention and read-write conflicts, optimizing transaction throughput and latency under high-load conditions.