Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Brivaracetam (BRV) sustained-release (SR) tablets have recently been approved to treat focal seizures in India. SR formulations enhance patient adherence and quality of life (QoL). We assessed safety and effectiveness of BRV-SR for epilepsy management in Indian real-life settings. METHODS: A post-approval observational study involving 1989 patients receiving BRV-SR from 181 centres were analysed. Primary endpoints are efficacy variables derived from seizure-related changes, and secondary endpoints include responder rate (≥50% reduction in focal-onset seizures [FoS]/focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures [FBTCS] frequency), usage pattern data, clinician's global impression on efficacy index (CGI-EI) and safety variables. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 42.33±12.33 years, and 1441 (72.44%) were men. Psychiatric comorbidities included depression (21.97%), sleep disturbance (15.54%), and anxiety (9.60%). The predominant seizure types were FoS (71.44%) and FBTCS (28.56%). BRV-SR 100 mg once-daily was most prescribed dose (57.37%) at baseline and follow-up visits (51.94%). Median seizure frequency decreased from 2 at baseline to 1 at follow-up visit. At follow-up, 72.1% patients were responders, and 63.75% were seizure-free. BRV-SR showed "marked" to "moderate" improvement in 92.99% of patients according to CGI-EI. Subgroup-analysis revealed a positive correlation between BRV-SR use in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, psychiatric co-morbidities, and behavioural adverse events (AEs) with past anti-seizure medications. AEs were rare, with none reported in 97.39% patients during study period. CONCLUSION: The BEAM study findings provide first real-world evidence on effectiveness and safety of BRV-SR in Indian real-life settings. Furthermore, BRV-SR is a feasible option for focal epilepsy management with good retention rates and improved QoL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ranganathan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: