OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Airway Scope for tracheal intubation by non-anaesthetist physicians. METHODS: Under supervision by staff anaesthetists, non-anaesthesia residents performed tracheal intubation using either the Airway Scope (n = 100) or Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 100). The time required for airway instrumentation and the success rate at first attempt were investigated. RESULTS: The time to secure the airway was shorter with the Airway Scope than with the Macintosh laryngoscope (p<0.001). The success rate at first attempt was higher with the Airway Scope than with the Macintosh laryngoscope (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Airway Scope may reduce the time to secure the airway and the incidence of failed tracheal intubation in novice laryngoscopists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirabayashi et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: