Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reaction of the [N(PPh3)2]+ salt of [Ru3(CO)9(B2H5)]– with [Ru3(CO)10(NCMe)2] yielded both the octahedral [Ru6(CO)17B]–1 and trigonal-prismatic [Ru6H2(CO)18B]–2 boride cluster anions. This result indicates that the choice of the trigonal-prismatic versus octahedral cage is not determined by the size of the interstitial atom. The salt [N(PPh3)2][Ru6H2(CO)18B] has been structurally characterised. The reactions of anions 1 and 2 with [AuCl(PPh3)], [AuCl{P(C6H4Me-2)3}], [{(Ph3P)Au}3O][BF4] and [{(2-MeC6H4)3PAu}3O][BF4] have been studied and the distribution of the products [Ru6(CO)17B{Au(PR3)}], [Ru6H(CO)16B{Au(PR3)}2] and [Ru6(CO)16B{Au(PR3)}3] as a function of R (Ph or 2-MeC6H4) and of the starting cluster has been examined. The trigold derivatives are best prepared by treating the octahedral anion 1 with [{(Ph3P)Au}3O]+. Single-crystal X-ray crystallography has confirmed that each of the gold(I) phosphine derivatives has an octahedral Ru6B core.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Housecroft et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: