Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term survival of a group of patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours, who relapse after chemotherapy and are retreated with a cisplatin and etoposide-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At the Charing Cross Hospital between 1979 and 1988 38 patients in relapse were seen. The median interval after primary therapy was 8 months. They were treated with an intensive cisplatin and etoposide-based regimen with cycles repeated at 7-10 day intervals, and with surgery in 22 patients. RESULTS: Forty-seven per cent of patients entered a second complete remission and 88% of these remain disease free. The overall survival was 46% with a median follow-up of more than 4.3 years. Surgery was performed in 14 of 18 patients who entered a second complete remission. Adverse risk factors before initial chemotherapy and the time to relapse did not predict outcome but patients with unresectable radiological masses after relapse therapy had a poor outcome despite normalization of serum tumour markers. The tumours of 68% of patients initially treated with cisplatin-based regimens and 62% of patients who also received etoposide remained responsive to conventional doses of these drugs at relapse. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is a group of patients with relapsed teratoma who can be cured without the need for very high dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow rescue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ledermann et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: