Key result
A PROFUND index score greater than 11 was associated with a significantly higher risk of one-year all-cause mortality in patients with acute heart failure (HR 1.838; 95% CI 1.410-2.396).
Why the study?
Heart failure is a highly prevalent syndrome mainly affecting elderly patients, in whom the presence of associated comorbidities is of great importance.
Observational (n=5,424)
Yes
The PROFUND index is a useful prognostic tool for predicting one-year mortality in patients admitted for acute heart failure, with higher scores correlating with significantly worse survival.
NH residence independently linked to higher adjusted 1-year mortality in acute HF; leaves open whether frailty-focused care improves outcomes.
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome with high prevalence, mainly affecting elderly patients, where the presence of associated comorbidities is of great importance. Methods: An observational study from a prospective registry was conducted. Patients identified from the National Registry of Heart Failure (RICA), which belongs to the Working Group on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), were included. The latter is a prospective, multicenter registry that has been active since 2008. It includes individual consecutive patients over 50 years of age with a diagnosis of HF at hospital discharge (acute decompensated or new-onset HF). Results: In total, 5424 patients were identified from the registry. Forty-seven percent were men and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 51.4%; 1132 had a score of 0 to 2 according to the PROFUND index, 3087 had a score of 3 to 6, and 952 patients had a score of 7 to 10 points. In the sample, 252 patients had a score above 11 points. At the end of the year of follow-up, 61% of the patients died. This mortality increased proportionally as the PROFUND index increased, specifically 75% for patients with PROFUND greater than 11. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows that survival at one year progressively decreases as the PROFUND index value increases. Thus, subjects with scores greater than seven (intermediate-high and high-risk) presented the worst survival with a log rank of 0.96 and a p < 0.05. In the regression analysis, we found a higher risk of death from any cause at one year in the group with the highest risk according to the PROFUND index (score greater than 11 points (HR 1.838 (1.410−2.396)). Conclusions: The PROFUND index is a good index for predicting mortality in patients admitted for acute HF, especially in those subjects at intermediate to high risk with scores above seven. Future studies should seek to determine whether the PROFUND index score is simply a prognostic marker or whether it can also be used to make therapeutic decisions for those subjects with very high short-term mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Méndez‐Bailón et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute Heart Failure (n=5,424). High PROFUND index score (>11 points) vs. Lower PROFUND index scores was evaluated on Death from any cause at one year (HR 1.838, 95% CI 1.410-2.396, p=<0.05). A PROFUND index score greater than 11 was associated with a significantly higher risk of one-year all-cause mortality in patients with acute heart failure (HR 1.838; 95% CI 1.410-2.396).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: