Traffic emissions at controlled intersections can be reduced when the possibilities of infrastructure‐to‐vehicle communication are put to good use. In this study the authors present two applications: one infrastructure‐based and one vehicle‐based that in concert are able to significantly reduce the overall emissions at a controlled intersection. The infrastructure‐based application employs a model‐predictive control approach, an advanced form of traffic‐adaptive control. The vehicle‐based application uses information gained from the infrastructure‐based application (i.e. the estimated time that the vehicle approaching the intersection will be allowed to enter the intersection and cross the stop line) to improve a vehicle's approach towards an intersection. Both applications have the same aim: to avoid unnecessary accelerations, decelerations and delay. For both peak and off‐peak hours, the results show that the application of a model‐predictive controller as opposed to the more traditional traffic‐actuated controller is beneficial both in terms of travel time reduction (∼15.5% in both cases) and carbon‐di‐oxide (CO 2 ) reduction (2.9 and 9.3%, respectively). Together with an approach advice the amount of CO 2 emitted in both cases can be further reduced with an additional 7%, assuming a 100% equipment ratio.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katwijk et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: