PURPOSE: There are few studies assessing public awareness of colorectal cancer even in developed countries. This questionnaire and telephone-based survey aimed to determine the degree of awareness of colorectal cancer among adults in a high-risk population with a high level of literacy. METHODS: Two thousand randomly-selected adults living in Singapore were invited to answer a questionnaire by telephone (T, n = 1,000) or by returned mail (M, n = 1,000). The questionnaire consisted of 20 questions relating to epidemiology, presentation, screening, and management of colorectal cancer. RESULTS: There was a compliance rate of 85.2 percent for telephoned subjects, but only 21.5 percent of mailed subjects returned a completed questionnaire. Only 2.7 percent of T and 1.4 percent of M named colorectal cancer as a fatal disease. Only 49.6 percent of T and 60.9 percent of M were aware that the colon and rectum are part of the intestines. A minority (T 11.7 percent, M 35.8 percent) were aware of screening as an important means against developing colorectal cancer. A large proportion (T 46.5 percent, M 34.9 percent) were unable to name even one symptom of colorectal cancer. There was low awareness of causative factors for colorectal cancer (T 39.6 percent, M 28.4 percent). A proportion (T 24.8 percent, M 28.4 percent) believed that colorectal cancer affects people less than 40 years of age. Newspapers and popular magazines exert far more influence (T 58.2 percent, M 52.1 percent) than television, the internet. or doctors in educating the public about colorectal cancer. Respondents with higher education level (junior college and above), as well as those with a positive family history, tend to score better in the knowledge section. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of colorectal cancer among the surveyed population was poor despite a relatively high incidence of the disease in Singapore. Public education regarding colorectal cancer is best done via newspapers and magazines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: